"Magoo"
<Magoo44@charter.net>
BLACK PR VS. FACTS -- what is The Difference?
How can you tell if someone is just using what Hubbard wrote as
Black PR? Black Pr is a tool Scientologists (at least within C
of $--that I know of) use to make less of another person.
It is their "tool" to try to discredit someone, in
whatever fashion is needed, saying whatever they need to, making
up as big or as small a lie they need to in order for others to
start to feel less about the person.
Thus the term Black PR. PR is a term for Public Relations. It is
what many individuals and companies use to make others interested
in them or their products, or to make others think well of them.
Black PR is supposed to have the opposite effect.
So if you're new to this newsgroup, how can you tell if what the
person is saying is fact, or just OSA hiding behind a fake name,
working to "Black PR" the person?
Here are a few tips:
#1. They will never say who they are. They (OSA) only use
anonymous names, from phony accounts. I know as I got roped into
setting these phony [Internet] accounts up, until I connected the
dots, realized what they were really doing (Stopping Free
Speech) and shortly after, I left C of $ forever.
http://www.lermanet.com/cos/toryonosa.htm
(The story of the OSA Int Top Secret Internet Mafia that did this).
Does that mean everyone using an anonymous account is OSA? Of
course not. However, when someone is found connected with a few
of the other things I will mention, and they are anonymous there's
a good chance it IS an OSA Op.
#2. Black PR, by it's nature, is used to make less of someone.
(It could also work for groups, but here on ARS< it's about
people). So usually the post will be about a PERSON, vs. an idea,
topic, etc.
#3. There will be statements made, with literally no facts or proof
to back it up. If someone states: "Jack is a liar, and he is
really here to harm this group".
Where is the "fact"? Now sometimes, due to many pointing
this out, an OSA op will pull together that Joe said he posted on
Friday night and really the post was on Saturday, so "This
proves he's a liar". I'll leave that to you to figure out if
that is a legitimate "Fact" or a stretch.
Keep in mind, we're dealing with a totalitarian organization,
hiding behind the cloak of religion that rips people off, uses
mind control, and charges a fortune for it, as well as practices
what Hubbard called,
"Fair Game" as
well as the breaking up families and using medical malpractice.
They've got a few SERIOUS irons in the fire, and we who have left,
and the critics have MUCHO Serious FACTS about this.
So naturally, they are going to work as hard as they can to keep
any and all attention OFF of their abuses, and confuse people
about who is posting. This IS their modus operands.
#4: They will never answer legitimate questions. You can ask,
and ask again. They might finally answer, but it takes some
serious work, and even then you'll find they never really
answered you. Hubbard's bottom line was, "Always attack,
NEVER defend".
So this you will see, in many different forms.
#5: OSA ops work in generalities constantly. They cannot use
specifics, as those are too easy to prove to be wrong. Thus you
will read these long, broad, sweeping statements, again without
any proof or facts to back them up. All you have to do is ask:
Where are the facts to prove this? What is the actual piece of
information that backs up the statement?
Most important of all is to make sure you do your own research.
I don't suggest counting on any one person. Read a large volume
of posts, and more importantly, Web sites. Find facts, information,
time and place, names of people, when, where, how, what? With
that, you will be able to piece this together and find out what
is really true, and what is not.
Good luck in your hunt!!!
Tory/Magoo ~dancing in the moonlight~
For more information, please see:
Or just type in "Scientology" and study both sides of
what comes up. You can't miss then :)
E-Mail: magoo44@charter.net
Black PR vs Fact... what is the differnce?
10 Dec 2003
In Scientology for 30 years
Out for 3 years, 4 months happily
For thinking and speaking my mind, I am:
Declared SP (SP 6 ^with Cumulative Cluster)
Expelled from C of S (Woooo hoooo!) :)
A Free Speech Advocate!
Free at last!!!
http://www.xenu.net
http://www.xenutv.com
http://www.torymagoo.org
http://www.lermanet.com/cos/toryonosa.htm
http://www.altreligionscientology.org
(818) 588-3044
Burbank, CA
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author
or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and opinions of
the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The name
"Scientology"® is trademarked to the "Church"
of Scientology. Neither this web page, nor this web site, nor any of the
individuals mentioned herein assisting to educate the public about the
dangers of Scientology are members of or representitives of the Scientology
organization.