"Magoo"
<Magoo44@charter.net>
I have had this discussion with a few people who have left
the Church (not) of Scientology.
Most people who leave Scientology immediately re-connect with
people they love. They realize they have been sapped by this
totalitarian organization that has insisted they do not speak
with anyone labled by them as "SP".
Due to their "Policy" many families are broken up.
Wives and husbands are broken up, as one or the other suddenly
realizes some things, and thinks differently.
For me my 27- year happy marriage ended soon after I announced
I was leaving. There was literally no way to communicate with
my husband about what I knew. Oh sure, we talked, but did he
hear? No. He could not. It's built in from early on, and he was
born into the Cult.
Before I go on, please let me clarify I'm for any parent and
whatever they chose to do, as long as it doesn't harm others.
I am 100% against Disconnection, and will speak out against
it, until it is stopped or cancelled.
However, I respect each parent, and I'm posting this as food
for thought, not as any kind of put down, or attempt to say
they've done the wrong thing. I truly believe that is up to
the parents. However, it's also my right to speak out about
what I feel is abuse, and clarify it. That's all I'm trying
to do here.
The worst, imho, are the Children, even if now grown adults,
who now cannot speak with their parents. That is considered
"Out Ethics" and seriously NOT ok. Free? Come on!
Of course on their (C of $) end of things, they HAVE to keep
these kids away from their parents, as IF they spoke to them,
they very well might wake up, and leave staff.
I guess I'm such an advocate for REAL "Free Speech"
vs their imposed version of non- free speech as I was in on
some of OSA's Attempts to cut off families from their kids,
while I was "in".
I was against it while I was "In" and I still am. It
just is not right. It is the opposite of "Free" to
hide a child, even if now a grown adult, from their parents,
no matter what age. Why can't they at least talk with their
parents if they really have free speech? Oh, because they
"Don't want to"?
Well, let's follow that insane conclusion down to it's most
probable end. We have PROOF, from skillions of Scientologists
who HAVE made that same supposed "Free choice" while
"in", and every single person I have met since I
have left IMMEDIATELY re-connected with those they loved, once
they left. It's number ONE on the list for most people.
So was it really their choice, or some imposed
"RULE" that they HAD to follow, or else. I say the
latter, as that IS what it is.
Even as an OT 7 -- a true, true believer -- when asked to
"Handle" a mother who wanted to desperately just talk
with her daughter, I said "NO!" I told them you are
DRIVING this woman insane by keeping her from her child, and I
still believe they are doing great harm to those they break off
from their families.
It has NOTHING to do with Free Speech. Here are the definitions of &
quot;Free".
In brackets are my comments (( )):
Main Entry: 1free
Etymology: Middle English, from Old English frEo; akin to
Old High German frI free, Welsh rhydd, Sanskrit priya own,
dear Date: before 12th century
1 a : having the legal and political rights of a citizen b :
enjoying civil and political liberty <free citizens>
c : enjoying political independence or freedom from outside
domination d : enjoying personal freedom : not subject
to the control or domination of another
(( Check that one out: "Not subject to the control or
domination of another" boom! There ya go.
"Disconnection" is totally the control and domination
of others-that's why it's imposed.))
(("Not determined by anything behond its own nature of
being." Again, Disconnection ONLY comes about by the
breaking of ones nature of being. All you have to do is ask
yourself, would ANYONE -- left to themselves -- considering you
have a loving relationship to start EVER decide "you
don't think the way I do, so I'm NEVER, EVER going to talk with
you?" Yes, some might most would not. However, that
isn't the issue. Within Scientology, people don't have a choice.
There has been much written about this and cults (mind Control,
Peer pressure) etc.
Whatever you call it, while "in" you have to
walk their walk. Is that their "Right"? Yes. That I
believe to be true. It is their right to stay, however please
don't say it is their FREE choice, as it is not.
It's "per policy" and these people for the most part
are TOTALLY cut off from the FACTS about Hubbard who created
these very policies they are following.
I know, I was too. I blindly followed, believing all to be true.
I fought tooth and nail for YEARS about medication. If it wasn't
for my mother, literally I would probably be dead. Then to leave
and find out ALL this same time Hubbard was ON Medication -- well
just what do you think I felt then? Loyalty?
Do you HONESTLY think I would have continued having Grand Mal
Seizures (which I did in the early '70's until my Mother got
me to wake up and realize they Were lying, Dianetics would NEVER
"fix" Epilepsy, and to take the medication I so much
needed) for ONE day if I'd known the FACTS, that Hubbard himself
was on medication?
I would have never gone through one more of these, let
alone months of them, and then years of mental torture as these
same "OT's" implied I was "too downtone,"
"not responsible enough" or "you have your
postulates wrong"...etc. Those labels went on until the
day I woke up and realized what a scam this is, and left.
Do you think these kinds of labels are not being put on your
kids? Do you think they are not damaging?
Most, if they knew one half of the facts about their group,
would walk out the door. "Disconnection" is not Free
Speech. It may be their Free choice, although even there I doubt
it, but it certainly violates FREE speech. They HAVE to do it, or
else. That's not free.))
(( These people I'm talking to say "well, it's their
choice." I still say it if it really was their choice, there
wouldn't be people between you and your child. Those people are
MAKING SURE these people/young adults do what THEY Say. If you
KNEW these same people were going to cut your childs arm off, by
manipulating how they think and "Proving to them it's the
right thing to do" would you still say, "It's their
choice"?
I doubt it. You'd fight with all you have to make sure to get to
your child, talk with your child, make sure they understand
EXACTLY how bad this choice is, and probably more. This is no
different.))
3 a : relieved from or lacking something unpleasant or burdensome
<free from pain> <a speech free of political rhetoric>
b : not bound, confined, or detained by force
4 a : having no trade restrictions
(((errrr.... Disconnection is all about restrictions. One CANNOT
speak to an "SP" or they too will be declared an SP.
It's a "high Crime" to do so.
The rest I will leave in, so the full definitions are here, but
I'm done commenting and only make my final point at the end.))
5 a : having no obligations (as to work) or commitments <I'll
be free this evening> b : not taken up with commitments or
obligations <a free evening>
6 : having a scope not restricted by qualification <a free
variable>
7 a (1) : not obstructed or impeded : CLEAR (2) : not being used
or occupied <waved with his free hand> b : not hampered
or restricted in its normal operation
8 a : not fastened <the free end of the rope> b : not
confined to a particular position or place; also : not having a
specific opponent to cover in football <a free safety>
c : capable of moving or turning in any direction <a free
particle> d : performed without apparatus <free tumbling>
e : done with artificial aids (as pitons) used only for
protection against falling and not for support <a free climb>
9 a : not parsimonious <free spending> b : OUTSPOKEN c :
availing oneself of something without stint d : FRANK, OPEN e :
overly familiar or forward in action or attitude f : LICENTIOUS
10 : not costing or charging anything
11 a (1) : not united with, attached to, combined with, or
mixed with something else : SEPARATE <free ores> <a
free surface of a bodily part> (2) : FREESTANDING <a free
column> b : chemically uncombined <free oxygen> <free
acids> c : not permanently attached but able to move about
<a free electron in a metal> d : capable of being used
alone as a meaningful linguistic form <the word hats is
a free form> -- compare 5BOUND 7
12 a : not literal or exact <free translation> b : not
restricted by or conforming to conventional forms <free
skating>
13 : FAVORABLE -- used of a wind blowing from a direction more
than six points from dead ahead
14 : not allowing slavery
15 : open to all comers
- freeness /-n&s/ noun
- for free : without charge
synonyms FREE, INDEPENDENT, SOVEREIGN, AUTONOMOUS mean not
subject to the rule or control of another. FREE stresses the
complete absence of external rule and the full right to make
all of one's own decisions <you're free to do as you
like>. INDEPENDENT implies a standing alone; applied to a
state it implies lack of connection with any other having power
to interfere with its citizens, laws, or policies <the
colony's struggle to become independent>. SOVEREIGN stresses
the absence of a superior power and implies supremacy within
a thing's own domain or sphere <separate and sovereign armed
services>. AUTONOMOUS stresses independence in matters
pertaining to self-government <in this denomination each
congregation is regarded as autonomous>.
Ok... so per these definitions, Free Speech means someone can
make up their own mind.
If within Scientology someone is TRULY Free to speak their mind,
why is it they have to "Go to Ethics" to get
"Handled" regarding this very subject?
I ask you that. Is "Disconnection" really Free Speech?
All the best :)
Tory/Magoo ~dancing in the moonlight~
For more information, please see:
E-Mail: magoo44@charter.net
IS DISCONNECTION "FREE SPEECH"?
16 Nov 2003
Pronunciation: 'frE
Function: adjective
Inflected Form(s): freer; freest
2 a : not determined by anything beyond its own nature or being :
choosing or capable of choosing for itself
b : determined by the choice of the actor or performer <free
actions> c : made, done, or given voluntarily or spontaneously
b : not subject to government regulation c of foreign exchange : not
subject to restriction or official control
In Scientology for 30 years
Out for 3 years, 4 months happily
For thinking and speaking my mind, I am:
Declared SP (SP 6 ^with Cumulative Cluster)
Expelled from C of S (Woooo hoooo!) :)
A Free Speech Advocate!
Free at last!!!
http://www.xenu.net
http://www.xenutv.com
http://www.torymagoo.org
http://www.lermanet.com/cos/toryonosa.htm
http://www.altreligionscientology.org
(818) 588-3044
Burbank, CA
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author
or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and opinions of
the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The name
"Scientology"® is trademarked to the "Church"
of Scientology. Neither this web page, nor this web site, nor any of the
individuals mentioned herein assisting to educate the public about the
dangers of Scientology are members of or representitives of the Scientology
organization.