Scientology's "Fair Game" is "misunderstood."

Tory/Magoo

Stunned!

"Magoo" <Magoo44@charter.net>
Scientology's "Fair Game" is "misunderstood."
31 Jan 2004

Fredric L. Rice wrote:

The Scientology cult's "Fair Game" policy, they claim, is simply misunderstood or actively and deliberately misconstrued. Scientology's web sites claim that Fair Game means only that immoral ex-customers who "violate our rules of ethics" may never purchase Scientology's frauds and scams again.

Except that Hubbard meant that "Fair Game" means what everyone else in English-speaking countries know what it means:

To target someone or something for combative or malicious persecution or death.

I mention it because on the FairGamed.ORG web site I cover a few instances of the normal application of the term.

Last year In Defense of Animals reported that the Southern Oregon Animal Rights Society picketed and protested against the State for their support of children shooting "canned pheasants." Among the various protest signs was several that read:

Pen-Raised Pheasants
NOT Fair Game
_Stop_ State-Sponsored Hunts

Nobody "misunderstands" or "deliberate misconstrues" what Hubbard meant by his policy of "fair game" against police, Mayors, attorneys, rights activists, newspapers, radio stations, and television stations. This "canned hunt" protest's usage of the term is exactly what Hubbard -- and his criminal organization he created -- means by the term.

When these pheasants are released, most of them simply sit on the ground disoriented and children simply walk up and shoot them on the ground. The "hunt's" organizers even tout this as a "positive hunting experience" and admit that the reason they organize such things is because they're "concerned that their children are not following in their footsteps and lack the taste for hunting."

How appropriate for a "sitting duck shoot" by armed children to be a good example of what Scientology's "Fair Game" policy means.

Thanks Fred! Here is my experience with "Fair Game" and I know Scientologists believe this to be true, to this day:

We were infatically told that "ALL Fair Game Activities were done only by the horrible, out tech people who were part of the out tech, "non-LRH" Guardians Office". (Don't mind the LRH set it up, helped write the programs, and sent his own wife to jail over the raid insisting he knew nothing!)

To those who are new here, you have to realize what a shock it was for people who were told the "G.O." are criminals, going to jail, etc. They had been on top of the world within Scientology for years. No one could touch anyone in the G.O. They were like their own little mafia, in a way, although "highly trusted by LRH, and run by his wife". Duh!

So then when they were busted, and we were told it was all "out tech" ('80's) Fair Game was Cancelled years ago -- of course the Fair Game policy I was show left out the bottom line -- "This cancellation does not apply to SP's" (Which is anyone they would want to use Fair Game on, really).

I even stood up in court (not invited either) and insisted to the Judge in the Wally trial that "There is NO Fair Game!"

Even years later, in the late '90's I was positive that the above statement of "No Fair Game" was still true even while I was opening up the phony accounts. [Sporgery attacks - flr]

I was sure of this (and as no one would tell me what they were using these accounts for, I believed my auditor and best friend, Bill Yaude, who roped me into it).

This continued until the day I went on the Internet, and connected the dots, realizing no matter what people are saying, to slime people's words, spam the newsgroup is merely trying to stop free speech, and that IS Fair Game!

For anyone who missed it, or is new here, here's the entire story about the present time OSA Int Top Secret Internet Mafia (aka: Present time Scientology G.O.) I was pulled into, and what happened that got me to wake up, and ultimately leave:

http://www.lermanet.com/cos/toryonosa.htm

Don't keep your head in the sand as I did, year after year, because "they care so much". Sure they do. The people you like, for the most part, are not those running these programs.

My best :)

Tory/Magoo!
http://www.xenu.net
http://www.torymagoo.org
:)

Tory/Magoo

The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The name "Scientology"® is trademarked to the "Church" of Scientology. Neither this web page, nor this web site, nor any of the individuals mentioned herein assisting to educate the public about the dangers of Scientology are members of or representitives of the Scientology organization.

Please feel free to E-Mail Tory